We have yet to study a text similar to Sissy written by George Kellogg (who is actually a female herself.) In this story, the idea and the separation of gender roles are completely broken. Sissy enjoyed doing girly things like sweeping, knitting, and these things make him happy.
When we think of Sissy living in the 21st century, we view little William as a very strange character. In the story, both girls and boys accepted him. If he grew up going to my high school, he would be made fun of and more than likely beat up by all the guys.
Why he is accepted? I don’t really know the clear answer but have a few suggestions. Is it because the boys used him for doing things they were not taught to do? Such as bake, sew, and knit? Or was it because they were children and didn’t really know better at the time? The answer only Kellogg knows. Whatever it may be, Kellogg created this text for a reason and showed Sissy as of value to both boys and girls. No one bothered him about the way he dressed or the activities he did, they accepted him regardless of these decisions.
Another thing that came to mind when reading this text was the fact that it was in the time period of the women’s rights movement. Was Kellogg trying to show the people of the 19th century that women can do a mans job and that a man should be able to do the things that women were automatically supposed to do (e.g. sweep, clean, knit, cook).